| Online ISSN | : | 2579-3039 |
| Print ISSN | : | 1829-2429 |
About the Journal
Armenian Folia Anglistika is the official peer-reviewed academic journal of the Armenian Association for the Study of English (established in 2005) and Yerevan State University (affiliated since 2015). Its primary objective is to provide a platform for the dissemination of original research and critical thought in the fields of English Language and Linguistics, Literature, Methodology, Culture, Translation Studies, and Gender Studies, fostering academic dialogue and collaboration among scholars, researchers, and educators within Armenia and across the global scholarly community.
In 2007, the Editorial Board of Armenian Folia Anglistika inaugurated a new section entitled Armenological Studies, designed to encourage valuable and innovative research in the areas of Armenian Linguistics, Literature, Ethnic Studies, History, Cultural History, and Genocide Studies. This section aims to promote interdisciplinary dialogue and contribute to a deeper understanding of Armenia’s cultural and intellectual heritage within a global academic context.
The journal is published twice a year and welcomes original scholarly articles. Submissions are reviewed by a multi-national Editorial Board, which is committed to maintaining high academic standards and fostering international collaboration in the humanities.
Current Issue
Front Matter
Methodology
-
Methodology
STUDENTS' REFLECTIONS ON ORAL PRESENTATIONS IN AN ENGLISH AS A LINGUA FRANCA CONTEXT: A CASE STUDY
AbstractMastering verbal communication is a key component of any academic and professional setting. However, oracy instruction can be considered a neglected aspect in students’ curricula, assuming perhaps that this skill does not need to be taught and can, instead, be acquired spontaneously along the academic pathway. This helps explain the numerous endeavours of scholars in developing writing courses. In fact, academic literacy has generally been associated with the mastery of composition skills, probably due to the long-standing tradition of scholarly publication. This study intends to highlight the importance of developing oral discourse by examining how postgraduate students from a Master’s Degree in English Studies perceive their own performance in oral academic presentations delivered in English as an L2 and lingua franca. By examining their experiences, attitudes, and perceived training needs, the study seeks to illuminate how learners conceptualise the challenges of oral academic discourse in ELF settings.
ReferencesBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Bjorkman, B. (2011). English as a lingua franca in higher education: Implications for EAP. Iberica, 22, 79-100.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2-27). Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press.
Cogo, A. (2016). “They all take the risk and make the effort”: Intercultural accommodation and multilingualism in a BELF community of practice. In L. Lopriore & E. Grazzi (Eds.), Intercultural communication: New perspectives from ELF (pp. 365-383). Roma Tre Press.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Pearson Education.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Hood, S., & Forey, G. (2005). Introducing a conference paper: Getting interpersonal with your audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.002
Hyland, K. (2007). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Jenkins, J. (2022). The future of English as a lingua franca? Routledge.
King, J. (2014). Silence in the second language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox.
Mauranen, A., & Jenkins, J. (2021). Linguistic diversity on the EMI campus: Insider accounts and perspectives. Routledge.
O'Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & E, M. K. (2017). Multimodal analysis for critical thinking. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1101493
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.
Sifakis, N. C., & Lopriore, L. (2022). ELF-aware pedagogy: Rethinking English language teaching. In J. Jenkins & W. Baker (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca (pp. 427-439). Routledge.
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity: The case for inclusive practice. Multilingual Matters.
-
Methodology
THE INTEGRATION OF MONDLY VR IN CHINESE EFL CLASSROOMS: A CASE STUDY
AbstractThe emergence of Virtual Reality (VR) has drastically altered the overall layout of language education. VR-powered technology enables language learners to practice their speaking skills in real-life, stress-free, and interactive conversational scenarios, which conventional teaching methods fail to meet. Hence, the present paper seeks to examine the efficacy of integrating VR-powered technology in English as a Foreign Language classroom settings for the development of speaking skills. To evaluate the impact of VR technology in improving students’ speaking skills, the paper employs a mixed-method approach, namely, in-depth case studies and quantitative data analysis. The findings provide evidence-based insights into how VR-supported tools ameliorate students’ conversational skills in terms of fluency and accuracy. The applicability of the content in developing conversational skills underlines the strong practical value of the research, as well as makes a solid case for its massive integration in language teaching. Considering its transformative potential, future research is not only warranted but crucial to modernizing and enriching EFL pedagogy.
ReferencesAina, J. K., Ogundele, A. G., & Olanipekun, S. S. (2013). Students’ proficiency in English language relationship with academic performance in science and technical education. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(9), 355-358. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-9-2
Alfiras, M., & Bojiah, J. (2020). Printed textbooks versus electronic textbooks: A study on the preference of students of Gulf University in the Kingdom of Bahrain. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(18), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i18.15217
Alrasheedi, A. (2020). Psychological factors influencing EFL learners’ speaking performance. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 3(12), 3676-3684.
Asrifan, A., Zita, C. T., Vargheese, K., Syamsu, T., & Amir, M. (2020). The effects of computer-assisted language learning on students’ English achievement and attitudes. Journal of Advanced English Studies, 3(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47354/jaes.v3i2.88
Aydın, S., & Uştuk, Ö. (2020). A descriptive study on foreign language teaching anxiety. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 8(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29228/ijlet.41827
Azkiyah, S. N. A. (n/d). English proficiency as a predictor of academic performance in contexts where English is not the medium of instruction. PASSA Journal, 65, 32-56.
Azir, M., Khan, R., & Lee, J. (2024). Virtual reality–based learning environments and student motivation: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 32(1), 45-62.
Burchinal, M., Howes, C., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Predicting child outcomes at the end of kindergarten from the quality of pre-kindergarten teacher–child interactions and instruction. Applied Developmental Science, 12(3), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/¬10888690802199418
Cendra, A. N., & Sulindra, E. (2022). Speaking accuracy, fluency, and beyond: Indonesian vocational students’ voices. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.24071/¬llt.v25-i2.4579
Chea, P. (2024). Beyond “My English is poor”: Unpacking the speaking challenges of Chinese EFL learners in China. Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 1(11), 18-41. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejheaa.v1i11.1007
Garduño, H. A. S., Martínez, M. I. E., & Castro, M. P. (2021). Impact of virtual reality on student motivation in a high school science course. Applied Sciences, 11(20), 9516. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209516
Grieve, J., Nini, A., & Guo, D. (2021). Analyzing language variation and change in digital communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(2), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa022
Grieve, R., Woodley, J., Hunt, S. E., & McKay, A. (2021). Student fears of oral presentations and public speaking in higher education: A qualitative survey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1281-1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1948509
Gülseçen, S., & Kubat, A. (2006). Teaching ICT to teacher candidates using problem-based learning: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 96-106.
Hassan, S. N. S., Bakar, N., & Melaka, U. T. M. (2012). Harnessing for Transformation of best practice in education: Proceedings of International Conference on Active Learning 2012 (ICAL 2012), 18-20 September 2012, UTeM Melaka.
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/¬s40692-020-00169-2
Hudson, C. (2016). Communication skills for effective management. Routledge.
Huang, L. D. (2021). Developing intercultural communicative competence in foreign language classrooms: A study of EFL learners in Taiwan. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 83, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/¬j.ijintrel.2021.04.015
Hamid, M. O., & Baldauf, R. B., Jr. (2008). Will CLT bail out the bogged-down ELT in Bangladesh? English Today, 24(3), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/-S0266078408000254
Kentmen-Cin, C. (2025). Hate speech on social media: A systematic narrative review of political science contributions. Social Sciences, 14(10), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14100610
Lamb, R. (2022). Virtual reality and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Elsevier eBooks, 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/-b978-0-12-818630-5.13075-1
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), e16348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
Mora, J. C., Mora‐Plaza, I., & Miranda, G. B. (2023). Speaking anxiety and task complexity effects on second language speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 292-315.
Musheke, M. M., & Phiri, J. (2021). The effects of effective communication on organizational performance based on the systems Theory. Open Journal of Business and Management, 09(02), 659-671. https://doi.org/10.4236/-ojbm.2021.92034
Parmaxi, A. (2020). Virtual reality in language learning: a systematic review and implications for research and practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765392
Peng J. (2024). English Language teaching methods: Exploring the impact of various approaches on students’ language learning outcomes. SHS Web of Conferences, 187, 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418701008
Pinto, D., Peixoto, B., Krassmann, A., Melo, M., Cabral, L., & Bessa, M. (2019). Virtual Reality in Education: Learning a Foreign language. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16187-3_57
Shadiev, R., Sintawati, W., Kerimbayev, N., & Altinay, F. (2024). Systematic review (2003–2023): Exploring technology-supported cross-cultural learning through review studies. Sustainability, 16(2), 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020755
Slater, M., Steed, A., McCarthy, J., & Maringelli, F. (1998). The influence of body movement on subjective presence in virtual environments. Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(3), 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779591368
Soid, N., Fatih, N. M., Fauzi, N. N., & Norman, N. E. (2025). Effective communication in building healthy and productive relationships. MES Management Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.56709/mesman.v4i1.631
Sulaiman, B. I., & Ahmad, M. A. (2025). Hate speech detection in Hausa code-mixed tweets using machine learning. Science World Journal, 20(4). https://scienceworldjournal.org/article/view/24519
Verga, L., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). How relevant is social interaction in second language learning? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00550
Uzun, T. (2021). Forms of communication in digital and social contexts: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, group, and mass communication. Journal of Communication Studies, 13(2), 45-58.
Villena-Taranilla, R., Tirado-Olivares, S., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2022). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K-6 education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100434
Xu, W. (2018). A study on the difficulties of developing English speaking abilities among Chinese tertiary EFL students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 176. Atlantis Press.
Yang, J., & Chang, Y. (2020). Factors affecting English oral communication competence of EFL learners: Cognitive, affective, and environmental perspectives. Asian EFL Journal, 24(3), 78-102.
Yuan F. (2023). Use of recitation input to improve students’ English writing in junior high school. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(6), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v3i6.5153
Zhang, Q., Peng, A., He, L., & Li, X. (2025). Virtual reality gaming: a tool for reducing fear and anxiety in university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1532753
-
Methodology
LEGAL ENGLISH: LEXICAL COMPETENCE AND CURRICULUM DESIGN
AbstractThis paper examines both linguistic and pedagogical aspects of legal vocabulary instruction in English for Law courses. The research examines legal language through its formal, precise, and culturally specific nature by studying vocabulary classification, polysemy, synonymy, and lexical field structure in legal discourse. The study aims to develop an effective teaching method for legal lexis to improve students' subject-specific fluency, legal reasoning abilities, and English communicative competence. The research applies theoretical models from applied linguistics, legal semiotics, and ESP curriculum design to achieve its objectives. The research employs descriptive and comparative methods to study authentic legal texts, analyze legal genre terminology and lexical patterns, and develop practical teaching methods for Armenian higher education. The paper examines content-based instruction and conceptual field mapping as recommended instructional methods. The research demonstrates that successful legal vocabulary instruction requires cognitive, contextual, and functional methods that move beyond memorization to develop semantic understanding and cultural awareness. The interdisciplinary approach leads to legal English curriculum innovation through recommendations for developing vocabulary-intensive ESP syllabi.
ReferencesBhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Bhatia, V. K., Candlin, C. N., & Gotti, M. (2008). Legal discourse across cultures and systems. Hong Kong University Press.
Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. Routledge.
Chirinova, I. I. (2016). Teaching legal English in higher education: A comparative perspective. Yurait Publishing.
Garner, B. A. (2019). Black’s Law Dictionary. Thomson Reuters.
Haigh, R. (2018). Legal English. Routledge.
Harutyunyan, A. A. (2011). English for law students: A lexical approach. YSU Press.
Harutyunyan, A. A. (2011). The specifics of legal terminology and its use in translation. Yerevan State University Legal Review, 3, 229-240.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
Khizhnyak, S. P. (1997). Yuridicheskaya terminologiya: Formirovanie i sostav [Legal terminology: Formation and structure]. Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. (in Russian)
Miloslavskaya, D. I. (2000). Typical difficulties in the semantic interpretation of a legal text. Legal Linguistics, Altai State University, 104-116.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585941
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Šarčević, S. (1997). New approach to legal translation. Kluwer Law International.
Sheigal, E. I. (2000). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of political discourse]. Peremena. (in Russian)
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press.
Tomakhin, G. D. (1981). Lingvostranovedcheskaya teoriya stranyevedcheskogo materiala [Linguo-Cultural theory of cultural material. Russian Language Publishers. (in Russian)
Voskanyan, A. (2019). The intercultural aspect of teaching the legal English sub-language. Yerevan State University.
-
Methodology
AI-ASSISTED DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AND EFL WRITING MOTIVATION: A CORRELATIONAL STUDY
AbstractThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) for learning personalization has emerged as an approach to address diverse learner needs. This quantitative correlational study examined the relationship between the perceived value of AI-assisted differentiated instruction and task motivation (intrinsic and extrinsic) among first-year English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students at Batna-2 University. A convenience sample of 120 students participated in the study, completing a questionnaire measuring perceived value of AI-assisted differentiated instruction and task motivation in EFL writing. Descriptive statistics revealed moderate levels of perceived value and task motivation. Pearson correlation analysis indicated a significant positive correlation between perceived value of AI-assisted differentiated instruction and overall task motivation. Additionally, separate analyses showed stronger correlations with intrinsic motivation than extrinsic motivation. These findings suggest that students who perceive greater value in AI-assisted differentiated instruction demonstrate higher levels of motivation in EFL writing tasks.
ReferencesAchmad, N., Hulukati, E., Pomalato, S. W., & Djafri, N. (2024). Development of an AI-based differentiated learning module for Quran-memorizing students to enhance mathematics achievement and motivation in elementary education. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 3(2), 646-658. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v3i2.351
Alharbi, M. A. (2019). EFL university students' voice on challenges and solution in learning academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 577-588. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15276
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.
Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240-3256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/ Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/¬10.1037/¬¬¬a0012803
Dörnyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the Cinderella of the L2 motivational self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.2
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2013). Teaching and researching: Motivation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833750
Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/-educsci13121216
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2019). Evidence-based practices in writing. Best practices in writing instruction, 3, 3-28.
Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/¬9781315717203
Ling, W. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1261955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
Pekrun, R. (2024). Control-value theory: From achievement emotion to a general theory of human emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 83.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guilford Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Yoo, S. J., Han, S., & Huang, W. (2012). The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace: A case from South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1017-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.015
-
Methodology
EMI TEACHERS AND AI: A TAM PERSPECTIVE
AbstractThis study aims to investigate and analyze the perceptions and the attitudes of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) teachers regarding the integration of AI technologies. In the context of language teaching, AI has gained increased attention among researchers; yet, the perspectives of teachers, who play an indispensable role in implementing and utilizing such technologies, remain underexplored. As such, the research aims to understand how these innovative tools are perceived and whether they help bridge existing language gaps or, conversely, deepen them in EMI settings. To this end, using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and a structured Likert‑scale questionnaire administered to 31 EMI teachers at M'sila University, this paper seeks to investigate EMI teachers’ acceptance of these AI tools, their perceived usefulness and ease of use, and the skills required for effective integration. Results indicate strong perceived usefulness (PU) and a highly favorable attitude toward use (ATT; M = 4.62, SD = 0.61), whereas perceived ease of use (PEU) is comparatively moderate. Despite positive PU and ATT, results further show that actual use (AU) remains modest (M = 2.20, SD = 1.12), suggesting a gap between favorable perceptions and pedagogical adoption. The findings corroborate prior studies reporting a gap between favorable perceptions and sustained classroom implementation, and offer insights into the growing literature on the conditions required to translate positive attitudes toward AI into actual use in EMI classrooms.
ReferencesAchili, N., & Zerouki, N. (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence in Algerian Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges from Teachers’ Perspectives. ATRAS Journal, 5(3), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.70091/atras/ai.34
AlDakhil, M., & AlFadda, H. (2021). EFL Learners’ Perceptions Regarding the Use of Busuu Application in Language Learning: Evaluating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). English Language Teaching, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n1p1
Amin, M. Y. M. (2023). AI and Chat GPT in Language Teaching: Enhancing EFL Classroom Support and Transforming Assessment Techniques. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33422/¬ijhep.v4i4.554
Belabdelouahab-fernini, L. (2021). Assessing an ESP Course at the Computer Science Department: The Case study of the University of M’Sila, Algeria. El Omda Review in Linguistics and Discurse Analysis, 5(2), 434-447.
Benadaa, A., & Chetouane, A. (2025). The ramifications of Digital Mediation for the Identity, Perception and Interpersonal Relationships of Algerian Youth in the 21st Century. Approved Scientific International, 11(3), 28-299.
Ben Ahmed, M. (2024). Algeria: Introduction Adopting English-medium instruction. Revue Des Arts, Linguistique, Littérature & Civilisations Université Peleforo Gon Coulibaly - Korhogo Language, 273-282.
Benaicha, B., & Semoud, A. (2024). Investigating Algerian EFL Teachers’ Attitudes Towards AI Utilization in Language Education. ATRAS Journal, 5(3), 130-150. https://doi.org/10.70091/atras/ai.8
Bouguebs, R. (2025). Shaping Algeria’s EMI Future: Advencing Beyound Linguistic Competence to Acheive Pedagogical Transformation. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, and Society (JSLCS), 8(2), 151-170.
Boukhelkhal, O. (2025). Algerian EFL Students’ Perspectives And Practices On Ai-Enabled Learning At The University Of Medea. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, AndSociety, 8(1), 93-110.
Chang, C. I., Choi, W. C., & Scholar, G. (2025). Exploring Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy and Educational AI Development : A Qualitative Study of Teachers and Researchers ’ Perspectives Intelligence (AI) Literacy and Educational AI Development . A Qualitative S. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.1077.v1
Chapelle, Carol, & A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer‐assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741-753. https://www.academia.edu/¬download/-891107¬11/¬week1_sla_call.pdf
Content, A. H., Holmes, A., Holmes, A., Commons, C., & License, A. (2015). Introductory Statistics. 1-105.
Curle, S., Rose, H., & Yuksel, D. (2024). English medium instruction in emerging contexts: An editorial introduction to the special issue. System, 122, 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103262
Daher, R. (2025). Integrating AI literacy into teacher education: a critical perspective paper. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00475-7
Darling-hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Efective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.
Guangwei, & Hu. (2014). English-medium instruction in Chinese higher education. Higher Education, 67(5), 551-567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/¬S10734-013-9661-5
Guerid, F., & Abdellatif, N. (2018). Specific Vocabulary Integration in an English for Specific Purposes Course. English for Specific Purposes World, 20(56).
Hamane, S. (2023). Language Shift in Higher Education in Algeria : A Comprehensive Examination of Advantages and Challenges to English-Medium Instruction (EMI). Soraya HAMANE Oran 2 University.
Hammoudi, A., & Zerouati, M. (2025). English as a Medium of Instruction and Research in Algerian Higher Education. Investigating Francophone Teachers’ Perspectives and Cognitive Language Processing, 8, 181-197.
Hanifi, A. (2025). Bilingual Instruction in Algerian Higher Education from FSO to EMI : Challenges and Expectations. El-Maarefa, Djoussour, 3, 87-95.
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Hyland, K., & Shaw, P. (2016). The Routledge handbook of english for academic purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657455
Julie, & Dearden. (2014). English as a medium of instruction-a growing global phenomenon. British Council. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072564.006
Khenioui, N., & Boulkroun, M. (2023). Exploring The Implementation Of English As A Medium Of Instruction In Algerian Higher Education:, Motivations, Challenges, And Strategies For Success. Afak for Sciences Journal, 50. https://doi.org/10.37167/1677-008-005-004
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2019). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language teaching. University of Oxford, 51(5), 1–9.
Martinez, M. N., & Bartholomew, M. J. (2017). What Does it Mean? A Review of Interpreting and Calculating Different Types of Means and Standard Deviations. Pharmaceutics, 9(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/¬pharmaceutics-9020014
Murphy, R. S., Wotley, D., & Minn, D. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into the EFL Classroom: Benefits and Challenges. Center for Fundamental Education, 40, 97-166.
Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232
Schorr, A. (2023). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its Importance for Digitalization Research: A Review. International Symposium on Technikpsychologie (TecPsy) 2023, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.2478/¬97883-66675896-005
Warschauer, M. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57-71.
Yahia, F., & Melouk, M. (2017). Integrating audio-visual aids and technology into teaching culture in the literature class: The case of 2nd year LMD level at Ouargla university. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 1(2), 57-71.
Zawacki-richter, O., Marín, V. I., & Bond, M. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1-27.
-
Methodology
CULTURAL CAPITAL, STUDY HABITS, AND EARLY ENGLISH ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM ALGERIAN PRIMARY SCHOOLS
AbstractThis study investigates how cultural capital and study habits influence fifth-year primary school pupils’ performance in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in El-Kantara, Algeria. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital, we employed an explanatory mixed-methods design combining structural equation modeling (SEM) of survey data (n = 532) with thematic analysis of teacher interviews. Results indicate that objectified cultural capital (books, digital tools, learning spaces) exerts the strongest direct effect on EFL outcomes, while institutionalized (parental education, occupational status) and embodied capital (language routines, parental involvement) also make significant contributions, primarily through their influence on study habits. Study habits emerged as a powerful mediator, linking family resources to classroom achievement. Qualitative findings illuminated these dynamics by revealing how access to resources fosters engagement, how family discipline shapes preparedness, and how French English hierarchies affect motivation. Together, the results demonstrate that EFL achievement cannot be understood solely through individual effort or pedagogical factors, but rather through the unequal distribution of cultural resources in early schooling. We believe that this study can contribute to debates on cultural capital by extending its application to a multilingual North African context, while offering implications for policy aimed at reducing educational inequalities.
ReferencesAlgeria Press Service. (2022, September 21). Teaching of English in primary education: A major reform for a promising future. APS – Algérie Presse Service. https://www.aps.dz/en/algeria/tag/English%20teaching
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Taylor & Francis.
Bensalem, E. (2018a). Foreign Language Anxiety of EFL Students: Examining the Effect of Self-Efficacy, Self-Perceived Proficiency and Sociobiographical Variables. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/¬SSRN.-3201901
Boukranaa, A. M., Mjahad, R. A., & Zine El Abidine, Z. A. E. A. (2024). Factors and Effects of Foreign Language Anxiety in EFL Classrooms: Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University as a Case Study. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 6(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.32996/¬jweep.¬2024.-6.1.10
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press.
Clemente, A. (2007). English as cultural capital in the Oaxacan community of Mexico. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 421-447.
De Graaf, N. D., De Graaf, P. M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92-111.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.
Kingston, P. W. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of cultural capital theory. Sociology of Education, 74, 88-99. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673255
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lamont, M. (2019). From cultural capital to moral boundaries. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 33-48). Routledge.
Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32(5/6), 567-606.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2002). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 438-486.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
Pishghadam, R., Noghani, M., & Zabihi, R. (2011). An application of a questionnaire of social and cultural capital to English language learning. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.5539/-elt.v4n3p151
Pishghadam, R., & Khajavy, G. H. (2013). Sociological and psychological model of foreign language achievement: Examining social/cultural capital and cognitive/metacognitive aspects. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 129-144.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Sullivan, A. (2001). Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment. Sociology, 35(4), 893-912. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856347
Zeghar, A. (2024). The language planning of French and English in Algeria: Historical perspectives and current issues. Aleph, 11(3-2), 33-47.












